Sunday, 06 December 2009

THE GLOBAL WARMING SCAM DODGE

Ken Berwitz

The emails were hacked, the blow "climategate" wide open, and global warming looks, for all the world, like a scam and a hoax.

What to do, what to do.....

Here, from Reuters, via the Times of London, is about the best they can come up with:

December 7, 2009

Climate e-mails were hijacked 'to sabotage summit'

 (Pawel Kopczynski/Reuters)

 

Globe artworks have been dotted around Copenhagen for the world climate change summit, which begins today amid claims of sabotage

Ben Webster, Environment Editor, in Copenhagen and Murad Ahmed

 

UN officials have likened the theft of e-mails from university climate researchers to the Watergate scandal, after claiming computer hackers were probably paid by people intent on undermining the Copenhagen summit.

 

Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, a vice-chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), said that the theft from the University of East Anglias Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was not the work of amateur climate sceptics, but was a sophisticated and well-funded attempt to destroy public confidence in the science of man-made climate change. He said the fact that the e-mails were first uploaded to a sceptic website from a computer in Russia was an indication that the culprit was paid.

 

Its very common for hackers in Russia to be paid for their services, he said. If you look at that mass of e-mails a lot of work was done, not only to download the data, but its a carefully made selection of e-mails and documents thats not random at all. This is 13 years of data and its not a job of amateurs.

 

Mr van Ypersele said that publication of the e-mails had undermined efforts by the IPCC to convince the 192 countries at the summit, which begins today, that they needed to act fast on emissions. We are spending a lot of useless time discussing this rather than spending time preparing information for the negotiators.

 

He rejected claims by sceptics that the e-mails showed efforts had been made to manipulate the data to exaggerate the warming trend. It doesnt change anything in the IPCCs conclusions its only one line of evidence out of dozens of lines of evidence.

 

Achim Steiner, director of the UN Environment Programme, said that the theft of emails had echoes of Watergate the burglary of the Democratic Partys offices at the Watergate building in Washington DC in 1972.

 

This is not climategate, its hackergate. Lets not forget the word gate refers to a place where data was stolen by people who were paid to do so. So the media should direct its investigations into that.

 

Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said that the stolen e-mails looked very bad and were fuelling scepticism, but said the media scrutiny was not unwelcome. Mr de Boer said: I think its very good that what is happening is being scrutinised in the media because this process has to be based on solid science. If quality and integrity is being questioned, that has to be examined.

 

This week the Met Office will release temperature data from 1,000 weather stations around the world in an attempt to shore up public confidence in its statements about the dangers of climate change.

 

The raw data will be impossible for any non-expert to interpret. The Met Office is also planning as soon as possible to release the computer code it used to analyse the data.

 

It is this analysis, by the Met Office in partnership with the University of East Anglia, that is at the centre of the controversy over the leaked e-mails.

 

The e-mails, which were sent over a 15-year period ending on November 12, first appeared on websites run by sceptics on November 17.

 

Almost a month before they were posted on a website popular with climate-change sceptics, the hacked information was sent to a BBC weatherman who had expressed his doubts about climate science on his blog. The BBC has confirmed that Paul Hudson received some documents on October 12 but no story was broadcast or printed by Mr Hudson or the corporation.

 

Then, on November 17, someone hacked into realclimate.org, a website popular with climate scientists. The hackers put all the UEA e-mails and documents on the website, using a computer based in Turkey. The websites owners responded quickly, shutting down the site within minutes.

 

Finally, using a computer in Saudi Arabia, the hackers posted a link on the Air Vent blog. The link sent readers to a file that was stored on computers in Russia. Only then did others begin to pick up on the story.
 
Translation:

-It isn't what is right in front of your eyes.  Honest.

-The people who hacked it were paid professionals. 

-The data that were dumped didn't mean anything. 

-And only experts - that would be us - can really read this stuff.

Disregard that man behind the curtain......

If these guys think this is going to work, they are even more ridiculous than they already appear.  And that, folks, takes some doing.


WHY I DIDN'T POST TODAY

Ken Berwitz

Some things take precedence over others. 

My wife and I took our transcendentally fabulous (almost 3 year old) grandson into New York City today.  We hit all the hot spots.  F.A.O Schwarz (yes, of course we bought him toys), The Marketplace at the New York Hilton for lunch, Rockefeller Center to see the tree, Dean & DeLuca for hot chocolate and a big cupcake, that kind of stuff.

And now we're babysitting him and his 3 week old sister, while mom and dad get out for some much-needed R & R.

Tomorrow I'll try to post more.  But we wouldn't have traded today for anything.


Buy Our Book Here!


Return to Current Blog
We're Hopelessly Partisan

hopelesslypartisan.com, is a web site which is dedicated to honest, blunt, debate on the issues of our time.


About Us



Privacy Notice: In conjunction with the ads on this site, third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your browser, or using web beacons to collect information.


At “Hopelessly Partisan” we discuss all issues, big and small. In here, nothing is sacred and nothing is out of bounds.

So settle back, preferably after laughing your way through a copy of “The Hopelessly Partisan Guide To American Politics”, and let the battle begin. In this blog, your opinion counts every bit as much as anyone else's, maybe even more.

And to show that my willingness to provide all sides of the issues is sincere, here are links to a variety of web sites, from the left, the middle (more or less) and the right. Read them and either smile in agreement or gnash your teeth in anger!!