Friday, 07 November 2008
SENATOR FRANKEN? THEY'RE WORKING ON IT
On Tuesday, Norm Coleman barely beat out al franken to retain his senate
seat from Minnesota.
That, however, does not mean he is going to be the senator. His win is
in the process of being expunged from the record....or, at the very least,
Democrats are giving it their best shot.
John McCormack of the Weekly Standard gives us the details - details you
won't find in almost any mainstream media. The bold print is mine:
Markos Moulitsas notes that Norm Coleman's lead over Al Franken has been diminishing:
A reader has been tracking vote results updates
from the Minnesota's SoS office:
That means the gap has gone down from 443, to
437, to 337 as provisional and other straggler ballots are counted. It was 477
votes last night.
Coleman's lead is now down to 236 votes, but the gap is not tightening because "provisional and other straggler
ballots" remain uncounted. According to the Minnesota Secretary of State's
office, the state does not have provisional ballots and all absentee ballots had
to arrive on or before Election Day to be counted.
Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie told me
in a phone interview this afternoon that the vote totals are fluctuating because
county election officials are correcting errors in the unofficial vote
totals. "The most common issue is the transposition of numbers,"
Ritchie said. "Depending on the county and the circumstance, there are
occasionally people late at night on election night and 84 becomes a 48, and
they might skip a digit."
Ritchie told me that in one county, "there was a 1
left off of a number so there was a hundred vote error"--the correction of which
cut into Norm Coleman's unofficial lead. When I asked which county had seen this
100 vote shift toward Franken, Ritchie told me it would be too difficult to look
at the screenshots of the website--static pictures of the site captured
throughout the day--and determine which county it was.
According to Ritchie, "when the recount
begins there will be representatives [of the Franken and Coleman campaigns]
there" to monitor the process, but "before the recount begins it is the job of
the local county and city election officials to accurately determine the
results." Ritchie, a member of Minnesota's Democratic-Farm-Labor party, said
that most of those officials are elected and all are officially
The Coleman campaign did not return calls this
evening inquiring if they were concerned that these vote totals--which have been
shifting in Franken's favor--are currently being reevaluated without the
oversight of campaign officials. Ritchie said he was confident that votes were
shifting because of honest errors. "There isn't much tolerance here for partisan
manipulation of elections on any basis whatsoever," he said.
There will be certification hearings on Monday, at
which point there will be hard numbers going into the manual statewide recount.
The law governing how a voter's intent will be determined during the recount may
be found here. A recent statewide recount for a judicial race in Minnesota resulted in
only a 7 vote difference from the initial results. In that race, about 100,000
ballots were cast, while nearly 3 million Minnesotans voted in Tuesday's
This has all the odor of the phony "adjustment" of votes in Washington State
four years ago, which caused Republican Dino Rossi to lose to Democrat
Christine Gregoire after he won the election AND the recount. In that
fraud, hundreds of votes from (vastly Democratic) King Country magically
materialized after the fact, were added in, gave her a win by something like 143
votes, and then they stopped counting.
Why count any more, they got the result they wanted, didn't they?
This seems to be happening to Norm Coleman now, even as
I write this. He will either lose to al franken, or come within a hair's breadth of doing so.
This is the voter fraud - the REAL voter fraud - mainstream media can't seem
to find a reason to be outraged about.
DON FEDER ON WHY MCCAIN LOST
I respect Don Feder greatly. Yes, he is to the right of where I am and
yes, his attitudes on same-sex marriage differ from my own. But for the
most part I find him right on target.
He has written a very thought-provoking essay on why John McCain lost the
presidency. I think it is so well worth reading that, though it is a bit
longer than what I usually post here, I am putting every word below:
HOW MCCAIN DEFEATED MCCAIN
GrassTopsUSA Exclusive Commentary
By Don Feder
had told me last year that, come the fall of 2008, I would be praying for John
McCain to become the next president of the United States, I would have had three
words for him seek psychiatric help. (McCain is my kind of Republican the way
rap is my kind of music.)
But, in the last
four months of the campaign, thats exactly what I was doing praying for a
McCain victory not because McCain is so good (any resemblance between the
Arizona Senator and a conservative is purely coincidental), but because I would
have done almost anything to spare my country from the nightmare that is Barack
Now that the worst has happened, the blame game begins.
Some will fault
the leftist media, which lost any sense of balance and objectivity and
practically panted over the Kenyan-American.
Others will point
to the huge disparity in fundraising. Obama outspent McCain by nearly three to
one. Still, if it was only about money, John Forbes Kerry whos married to Ft.
Knox would have won the 2004 campaign. As a friend put it, McCain failed to
raise the money to project the message he didnt have.
There are those
who will attribute McCains defeat to the unpopularity of outgoing President
George W. Bush, or the financial meltdown for which Republicans unfairly took
the fall, or the fact that only once in the post-war era has a two-term
president been succeeded by a member of his party.
It also didnt
help that McCain resembled Methuselahs grandfather, as presented by Madame
Tussaud's. We live in an age of image where how you look matters more than what
you believe or what youve done.
But, in the final
analysis, Republicans lost because they nominated their weakest candidate. And
McCain lost because hes McCain.
As a member of
Club Capitol Hill, McCain was best known for cooperating with Democrats,
reaching across the proverbial aisle to embrace big government halfway. Perhaps
hed spent so much time forging coalitions with the left that hed forgotten how
to fight it if he ever knew.
For the past two
decades, McCain basked in the adoration of the mainstream media. He was their
pet Republican. They honored him with the accolade maverick their term of
endearment for a Republican who specializes in betraying his own party (as
McCain did with Campaign Finance Reform). Then, when the bigger, better deal
came along, The New York Times et al. decided that the former object of
their affection was a Republican after all, and hateful to boot.
Of course the
Fourth Estate did everything it could to elect Barack Hussein Obama. (To a large
extent, he is their creation.) What else is new?
If the media
chose our presidents if they were omnipotent, as many conservatives believe
why did the GOP win five of the last eight presidential elections? Was the media
enamored of Ronald Reagan infatuated with George W. Bush?
media bias was worse this year than in any election in memory. But that handicap
could have been overcome, had McCain run a real race.
Like Bush Sr. in
1992, McCain was the victim of hubris.
thought he could win on experience alone. Im John McCain. I was a war hero.
Ive been in the Senate for 22 years. Im a reformer. I know how to work with
the other party. How can voters possibly choose a four-year veteran of the
Senate, with questionable associations, over me? McCain mused. But they did.
McCain did a poor
impression of a conservative.
opponent of regulation and champion of the market economy was neither. In
September, McCain rushed back to Washington to vote for the $700-billion bailout
package for financial institutions.
In October, he
offered socialism lite to rescue improvident borrowers and feckless lenders,
proposing that $300 billion of the $700 billion bailout be used to buy the loans
of people who took out mortgages they couldnt pay, which would then be written
down to affordable levels. The full impact of any losses would be borne by the
Treasury (read, the taxpayers).
Soon to follow,
bailouts of people who take out loans for cars they cant afford. And how about
the grads who dont want to be burdened with student loans? Why stop at
mortgages? Why should any borrower be responsible for his
taxes, which McCain promised to lower for everyone, the principal difference
between his economic program and Obamas was the wrapping.
There were issues
McCain couldnt use and issues McCain wouldnt use.
Americans overwhelming favor a crackdown on illegal immigrants the carriers of
poverty, crime and social fragmentation.
The Democrats are
the party of porous borders. Barack Obama did everything to signal his support
for alien lawbreakers except giving them backrubs and enchiladas as they cross
the Rio Grande.
Republicans could have appealed to middle-class rage over the failure to control
our borders if anyone but Senor Amnesty was the nominee. Along with his buddy,
Ted Kennedy, in 2007, McCain was the co-sponsor of a bill to regularize the
status of roughly 12 million undocumented workers. Talk about throwing away a
winning issue. BTW, two-thirds of Hispanics voted for Obama.
McCains record was mixed. He voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment each
time it came before the Senate, but said he supported state marriage
it was one of many social issues that McCain resolutely refused to discuss on
the campaign trail notwithstanding that his opponent promised to repeal the
Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which says states dont have to
recognize same-sex unions contracted elsewhere.
On Tuesday, state
defense of marriage amendments passed in California by 52% to 48%, in Arizona by
57% to 44%, and in Florida one of McCains big electoral losses by a
landslide vote of 62% to 38%.
three latest, marriage protection amendments have been on the ballot in 31
states, and passed every time.
Alan Sears of
Alliance Defense Fund notes that in California, there were 1.5 million more
votes for marriage than McCain. Floridas amendment got 779,000 more votes than
the Republican ticket. And in McCains home state, the vote for marriage
exceeded his total by 25,000. In Florida, the vote for marriage surpassed
McCain's total by almost 780,000. If McCain had picked up 98,000 of those votes,
by stressing his marriage stand, he would have carried the
highlighting Obamas stealth campaign for gay marriage might have helped McCain?
Rev. Jeremiah A Wright The October 27 issue of Newsweek explained
McCains refusal to discuss Obamas racist, Marxist pastor: Many senior
advisors, as well as McCains running mate, Sarah Palin, believe the campaign
should remind voters of Obamas ties to Wright, whose inflammatory sermons
emerged as a problem for the Democratic nominee during the primary. If we were
to go with an ad during the final weeks of this campaign showing excerpts of
(Wrights) sermons, we would probably win, says one senior McCain aide
who declined to be named discussing internal debates on tactics. But we
the following ad:
Announcer: Listen to the man who was Barack Obamas pastor for 19 years -- the
man whose advice Obama said he valued.
Cut to clips of
Wright: God d*** America. We (the U.S. of K.K.K.) started the AIDS
virus. Racism is how this country was founded and how this country is still
run. White folks greed runs a world in need. The United States cannot do
terrorism on other people and expect it never to come back on you. America is
still the No. 1 killer in the world.
19 years, Obama sat in Wrights church and listened to this. He and his wife
gave the church $26,000 in one year. How can we trust the judgment of a man who
associated with an anti-American demagogue for almost two decades? Can we expect
courage from a man who was afraid to confront the ravings of his own pastor,
until he was forced to do so as a candidate?
association with Wright spoke volumes about the type of president he would make.
It could have raised serious doubts in the minds of many about the Democrats
competence to lead the nation.
wouldnt touch the issue, for fear of being called racially insensitive.
Ultimately, the Republican standard-bearer chose sensitivity over the
cop-out notwithstanding, the media still painted McCain as the Michelangelo of
the smear. In a November 5 editorial, The New York Times claimed the
Arizonan lost because he forsook his principles for a campaign built on anger
and fear. (In an October 7 editorial, The Slimes accused McCain-Palin of
entering "the dark territory of race-baiting and
what McCain did was to betray his supporters by running a campaign without the
brains, heart and guts to win.
Palin as his running mate was McCains first and last smart move. Other than
that, McCains campaign was much like the rest of his political career
equivocal, hesitant, passionless and lacking any real focus or genuine
commitment to principles.
More than a
partisan media, Bushs ratings, the Fannie-Mae fiasco, and Democratic
fundraising, John McCain is responsible for the defeat of John McCain.
The next four
years will test the mettle of both Republicans and conservatives, who too often
follow the GOP over a cliff.
may be the best thing thats happened to the movement and the party in a long
well learn to fight again. Maybe well rediscover the value of choosing
principle over expediency. Maybe well discover that we cant compromise with an
enemy which loathes us and despises everything this country used to stand for.
If so, John
McCain may have performed his most important service to his country since the
This should be required reading for every Republican who thinks the path to
victory is being almost like a Democrat.
Thanks, Don. I don't always agree with you, but you always make me