Friday, 17 October 2008


Ken Berwitz
Sometimes you just have to laugh.  These laughs come to us via John Hinderaker of
In this case, the laugh is on Joe Biden (how many letters is in "jobs") and if you're Barack Obama and Sarah Palin it's.....well, you can see for yourself below.  No further comment needed by yours truly.


I've always kind of liked Joe

Biden, notwithstanding his mendacity during the current campaign. He's been in the Senate pretty much his whole life and is, therefore, a gasbag, but I've always thought that if you scratch the surface just a little, he doesn't take himself that seriously.

Still, there's a reason why he's called "Slow Joe"

Biden. Can you imagine if Sarah Palin said anything this stupid? The election would be canceled:

Speaking of Sarah

Palin, a local dance teacher emailed us this Photoshopped exemplar of bipartisanship, from "Dancing With the Stars:"


If this year's election were decided on looks and style, Obama would win in a landslide--it's hard to imagine John McCain on "Dancing With the Stars." But who knows: maybe this year's baseball playoffs are an omen. Television executives hoped for a Dodgers-Red Sox World Series almost as fervently as they hope for an Obama victory in November. But it wasn't meant to be; the power-hitting, lunch-bucket Philadelphia Phillies have already crushed Los Angeles, and the unglamorous (but very good) Tampa Bay Rays are about to finish off the Red Sox, whom they bested, too, in the regular season.

Maybe, likewise, the better but less glamorous Presidential ticket will win this year, too.



Ken Berwitz
Why does Joe Biden toss around the BS so much?  Would he do it as much if media held him to the same standards they hold Republicans? 
Read the following piece by Steve Gilbert of and think about what they'd have done with this if it were, say, Sarah Palin:

Why Joe Biden Doesn't Know Joe Plumber

October 16th, 2008

On this morning's installment of DNC/NBC's Today Show, Mr. Biden claimed that he doesn't know any "Joe the Plumbers" making $250,000 in his neighborhood:

"I don't have any "Joe the Plumbers" in my neighborhood that make $250,000 a year and are worried"

Given Mr. Biden's ritzy neighborhood, that is quite understandable.

From the October 1, 2008 edition of the New York Times:

Mr. Biden's 6,800-square-foot colonial-style house sits on four lakefront acres that he bought in March 1996 for $350,000.

An Everyman on the Trail, With Perks at Home


Published: October 1, 2008

For the millions of voters getting to know him, Senator Joseph R.

Biden Jr., the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, portrays himself at times as an average guy who takes the train to work, frets about money and basically has led a middle-class life.

Mr. Biden's 6,800-square-foot colonial-style house sits on four lakefront acres that he bought in March 1996 for $350,000.

"Ladies and gentlemen, your kitchen table is like mine," Mr. Biden said when Senator Barack Obama introduced him as his running mate. "You sit there at night after you put the kids to bed and you talk, you talk about what you need. You talk about how much you are worried about being able to pay the bills."

Mr. Biden certainly can trace his roots to the working-class neighborhoods of Scranton, Pa., and Claymont, Del., where he was raised. But these days, his kitchen table can be found in a 6,800-square-foot custom-built colonial-style house on four lakefront acres, a property worth close to $3 million.

Although he is among the least wealthy members of the millionaires club that is the United States Senate "he and his wife, Jill, a college professor, earn about $250,000 a year."  Mr. Biden maintains a lifestyle that is more comfortable than the impression he may have given on the campaign trail. A review of his finances found that when it comes to some of his largest expenses, like the purchase and upkeep of his home and his use of Amtrak trains to get around, he has benefited from resources and relationships not available to average Americans".

And, of course, Mr. Biden is completely misrepresenting what Joe "the plumber" Wurzelbacher actually said.

Mr. Wurzelbacher wants to put a down payment on a plumbing business that costs $250,000. He never claimed to be making that much in income.

But what's a little lie among blue-collar Joe's?

If if were Joe Biden (R-Del) do you think he'd ever get away with this? 

Me neither.


Ken Berwitz

Sometimes a network goes so far afield of objectivity or even the slightest pretense of it that you can't believe your eyes.

Here is a classic example from ABC news, and brought to our attention by Terry Trippany of

ABC News Used Obama Contributor as 'Expert' in Defense of ACORN

Justin Rood of ABC news came out with a tortured defense of ACORN today with the help of "experts" that claim there is no connection between invalid voter registrations and voter fraud. In order for Rood to make this claim he relies on the testimony of two "experts", namely Civil Rights attorney David Becker and Lorraine Minnite, a political science professor at Barnard College in New York.

A further examination of these two experts however shows that Rood is downright deceitful in presenting this argument. Lorraine Minnite actually donated $250 to the Obama campaign in March of this year while David Becker is anything but the Republican that he is portrayed as in the article. In fact Mr. Becker is a former director at People for the American Way, a liberal activist group that monitors "right wing organizations" and is currently launching a campaign aimed at Fighting Back Against Right-Wing Smears of ACORN.

Just in case you were unconvinced of the objectivity of Becker's former group note that they will be launching a full page ad in the New York Times in defense of ACORN.

We can hardly call these experts objective yet they are the people that ABC News is relying on to gloss over the multi-state voter fraud activities of a group that is intricately tied to Barack Obama.

An example of just how dishonest Rood is in his report is his characterization of Mr. Becker. 

But McCain's voter fraud worries about Acorn or anyone else are unsupported by the facts, said experts on election fraud, who recall similar concerns being raised in several previous elections, despite a near-total absence of cases.

"There's no evidence that any of these invalid registrations lead to any invalid votes," said David Becker, project director of the "Make Voting Work" initiative for the Pew Charitable Trusts.

Becker should know: he was a lawyer for the Bush administration until 2005, in the Justice Department's voting rights section, which was part of the administration's aggressive anti-vote-fraud effort.

This is called validation by omission, as if working in the Bush justice department implies that you are a Republican supporter. Omitted are the facts that Becker is a Berkeley graduate that also worked in the justice department for the Clinton administration. After leaving the justice department he spent nearly two years as the director of People For the American Way, a Tides Foundation project that monitors the activities of right wing groups, and has partnered with left leaning advocacy groups such as NARAL, NOW, the ACLU, the NAACP and the AFL-CIO just to name a few.

Becker also wrote a 2005 article in the Washington Post called Reviving Jim Crow?. This article took for President Jimmy Carter's side of the argument claiming that a Georgia law requiring voter ID was a form of discrimination; an argument that was rejected by the Supreme Court of the United States. 

I have no doubt that Becker is an expert lawyer but I'd be a little skeptical to consider him objective about ACORN by any stretch of the imagination. 

As for the use of Lorainne Minnite, what can I say?

"We're chasing these ghosts of voter fraud, like chickens without a head," said Lorraine Minnite, a political science professor at Barnard College in New York who has researched voter fraud and fraud claims for most of the past decade. "I think it's completely overblown, I think it's meant to be a distraction."

"This stuff does not threaten the outcome of the election," said Minnite. "How many illegal ballots have been cast by people who are fraudulently registered to vote? By my count, it's zero. I just don't know of any, I've been looking for years for this stuff."

Glad she can count. Too bad she can't be transparent and disclose her support of Barack Obama up front. It is both indefensible and unprofessional to use an Obama campaign contributor without attribution as an expert in a news article to dispute John McCain.

Finally Rood resorts to a blurb on Fact as final proof that there is no evidence linking ACORN's massive dump of invalid registrations to an attempt to commit voter fraud.

Even the non-partisan truth-in-politics Web site called foul on McCain's alleged possible conspiracy, noting that a Republican prosecutor handling a key Acorn registration fraud case has said there's no evidence indicating the group was involved in vote fraud

This displays a sort of fifth grade logic, taking one case from the past and presenting it as some sort of all encompassing proof. But then I am probably dissing fifth graders here because even they know that a single example doesn't form a rule.

Even though the site is completely anemic in terms of evidence supporting or negating proof of voter fraud with respect to ACORN we can note that the site does lists the following that is conveniently omitted in the ABC report:

It's true that the voter registration wing of the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now has run into trouble in several states. ACORN employees have been investigated and in some cases indicted for voter registration fraud. Most recently, more than 2,000 registrations in Lake County, Ind., have turned out to be falsified.


Meanwhile, on the other side of the table, Obama wasn't entirely forthcoming about his relationship with ACORN:

Obama: The only involvement I've had with ACORN is, I represented them alongside the U.S. Justice Department in making Illinois implement a motor voter law that helped people get registered at DMVs.

He did, but that wasn't his only involvement. He also worked closely with ACORN's Chicago office when he ran a Project Vote registration drive after law school, and Obama did some leadership training for Chicago ACORN. The Woods Fund, where Obama served as a board member, gave grants to ACORN's Chicago branch; both organizations are concerned with disadvantaged populations in that city. And during the primaries of this election, Obama's campaign paid upwards of $800,000 to the ACORN-affiliated Campaign Services Inc. for get-out-the-vote efforts (not voter registration). Those services were initially misrepresented on the campaign's Federal Election Commission reports, an error that some find suspicious and others say is par for the course.


For a more honest assessment of ACORN and I suggest Stanley Kurtz and Jim Hoft. ABC news clearly can't be counted on to objectively report their activities.

The mainstream media are wholeheartedly engaged in attempting to elect Barack Obama President.  And in order to do so they have scrapped their neutrality and their integrity.

There is a difference between journalism and propaganda.  A very big one.  But you'd never know it in this election.

Buy Our Book Here!

Return to Current Blog
We're Hopelessly Partisan, is a web site which is dedicated to honest, blunt, debate on the issues of our time.

About Us

Privacy Notice: In conjunction with the ads on this site, third parties may be placing and reading cookies on your browser, or using web beacons to collect information.

At “Hopelessly Partisan” we discuss all issues, big and small. In here, nothing is sacred and nothing is out of bounds.

So settle back, preferably after laughing your way through a copy of “The Hopelessly Partisan Guide To American Politics”, and let the battle begin. In this blog, your opinion counts every bit as much as anyone else's, maybe even more.

And to show that my willingness to provide all sides of the issues is sincere, here are links to a variety of web sites, from the left, the middle (more or less) and the right. Read them and either smile in agreement or gnash your teeth in anger!!